<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ChemIsCool Blog</title>
	<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog</link>
	<description>Teaching college chemistry and enhancing the experience with technology and plain old common sense thinking</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Note to Self by jmorello</title>
		<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=5#comment-6</link>
		<author>jmorello</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=5#comment-6</guid>
					<description>I like the slightly modified look of the blog, but I'm wondering why you have set it up so that one has to log in to leave a comment?  What was your thinking there?

Even though I did get the excel sheet with macros to open on my machine, I never was able to get it to work like it was supposed to.  I tried changing values, and nothing happened.  I wonder what I'm doing wrong . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the slightly modified look of the blog, but I&#8217;m wondering why you have set it up so that one has to log in to leave a comment?  What was your thinking there?</p>
<p>Even though I did get the excel sheet with macros to open on my machine, I never was able to get it to work like it was supposed to.  I tried changing values, and nothing happened.  I wonder what I&#8217;m doing wrong . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Excel Toys by John Morello</title>
		<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-5</link>
		<author>John Morello</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-5</guid>
					<description>I'll try that.  

Well, I just tried.  Excel security is checked to be prompted about macros and, in fact, I am all the time getting this message on other files I receive.  With yours, I got no "macro warning" even though the option was checked at the time when I tried it.

I opened the spreadsheet again after checking the setting, and still no macro alert.  I use a Mac -- I hope that's not the issue.  I shouldn't be.  I'll try it on my PC and see if there are different results.

I like your new theme -- kind of like the Chem Department "Drupal" site we looked at today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll try that.  </p>
<p>Well, I just tried.  Excel security is checked to be prompted about macros and, in fact, I am all the time getting this message on other files I receive.  With yours, I got no &#8220;macro warning&#8221; even though the option was checked at the time when I tried it.</p>
<p>I opened the spreadsheet again after checking the setting, and still no macro alert.  I use a Mac &#8212; I hope that&#8217;s not the issue.  I shouldn&#8217;t be.  I&#8217;ll try it on my PC and see if there are different results.</p>
<p>I like your new theme &#8212; kind of like the Chem Department &#8220;Drupal&#8221; site we looked at today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Excel Toys by Charlie</title>
		<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-4</link>
		<author>Charlie</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-4</guid>
					<description>John - thanks for trying.  Instead of the "macros" option, you need to set your security to "medium", close Excel, then reopen the file.  You'll be prompted to ask whether you want macros to run - say yes - then the file will work properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John - thanks for trying.  Instead of the &#8220;macros&#8221; option, you need to set your security to &#8220;medium&#8221;, close Excel, then reopen the file.  You&#8217;ll be prompted to ask whether you want macros to run - say yes - then the file will work properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Excel Toys by John Morello</title>
		<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-3</link>
		<author>John Morello</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
					<description>I took a deep breath and tried to fiddle with alka seltzer simulation.  It downloaded successfully to my computer, but I was unable to get any of the yellow values to change by pressing on the "arrow buttons."  I opened the macros option, and it asked me for the name of the macro -- at which point I was stumped.

I must say that the charts and graphs looked really swell -- I was just too inept to get them to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a deep breath and tried to fiddle with alka seltzer simulation.  It downloaded successfully to my computer, but I was unable to get any of the yellow values to change by pressing on the &#8220;arrow buttons.&#8221;  I opened the macros option, and it asked me for the name of the macro &#8212; at which point I was stumped.</p>
<p>I must say that the charts and graphs looked really swell &#8212; I was just too inept to get them to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What am I Thinking? by John Morello</title>
		<link>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=3#comment-2</link>
		<author>John Morello</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chemiscool.org/tltblog/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
					<description>This post makes me recall my days as an overwhelmed science student, trying to make sense of so many different things at one time.  I like the way you have described the problem, and it certainly seems to me that the new approach (discussion after the experiment rather than before, the use of common sets as an option, etc.) offers some promise for addressing the gaps you've identified with the current approach.

One thought, though, is how the revised approach uniqueness deals with the potential for information overload (being overwhelmed) as you describe it.  Students still have a lot to sort through, even if it comes at them at different times.  So here, I guess, is one of those &#34;assessment&#34; questions -- whether the altered approach enabled by the &#34;technological&#34; adjustments results in students feeling less overwhelmed and better able to make sense of the chemical conepts.  Part of your objective is to help students learn the chemistry better, but there's also an affective component here -- enabling students to react less negatively to the world they are being exposed to (esapecially those students who do not see themselves as moving toward science as a fiel).

Good luck with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post makes me recall my days as an overwhelmed science student, trying to make sense of so many different things at one time.  I like the way you have described the problem, and it certainly seems to me that the new approach (discussion after the experiment rather than before, the use of common sets as an option, etc.) offers some promise for addressing the gaps you&#8217;ve identified with the current approach.</p>
<p>One thought, though, is how the revised approach uniqueness deals with the potential for information overload (being overwhelmed) as you describe it.  Students still have a lot to sort through, even if it comes at them at different times.  So here, I guess, is one of those &quot;assessment&quot; questions &#8212; whether the altered approach enabled by the &quot;technological&quot; adjustments results in students feeling less overwhelmed and better able to make sense of the chemical conepts.  Part of your objective is to help students learn the chemistry better, but there&#8217;s also an affective component here &#8212; enabling students to react less negatively to the world they are being exposed to (esapecially those students who do not see themselves as moving toward science as a fiel).</p>
<p>Good luck with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
